Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of cluster abundance prediction using CCL backend #13

Open
payerne opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Implementation of cluster abundance prediction using CCL backend #13

payerne opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@payerne
Copy link
Collaborator

payerne commented Nov 27, 2021

Implementation of cluster abundance cosmological prediction with CCL as a backend for:

  1. cluster count in mass (respectively mass proxy) and redshift bins (for binned likelihood)
  2. cluster count for individual masses (respectively mass proxies) and redshifts (for un-binned likelihood)
@payerne payerne self-assigned this Nov 27, 2021
@payerne
Copy link
Collaborator Author

payerne commented Dec 1, 2021

From now it is still on my personal github repository, since the we did not really discussed about the code structure on the repo.

The code is available here. It allows to compute the cluster count:

  • in mass-redshift bins (for binned-likelihood),
  • for individual masses and redshifts (for un-binned likelihood),
  • in mass proxy-redshift bins (proxy modeling is coded here),
  • for individual mass proxies and redshifts.

For MCMC’s reasons, I implemented different methods to fasten the computation of cluster count, and I compared the recovered precision to the direct CCL prediction (by using the standard use of scipy.quad and scipy.dqblquad for numerical integration). The recovered precision is tested in this notebook for the mass-redshift case, and this notebook for the mass proxy-redshift case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant