Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a "meme" flair/tag that we can block across all communities and instances, similar to NSFW #4988

Open
5 tasks done
MaximilianKohler opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
area: discovery enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@MaximilianKohler
Copy link

Requirements

  • Is this a feature request? For questions or discussions use https://lemmy.ml/c/lemmy_support
  • Did you check to see if this issue already exists?
  • Is this only a feature request? Do not put multiple feature requests in one issue.
  • Is this a backend issue? Use the lemmy-ui repo for UI / frontend issues.
  • Do you agree to follow the rules in our Code of Conduct?

Is your proposal related to a problem?

There are topics I'm interested in, but even though many communities have quality content the memes get voted to the top so they're all I get to see on my front page. I do not want to see memes (low-quality, mindless content designed to keep mindless people infinitely scrolling) from any community.

Eg: https://lemmy.ca/c/fuckcars

Meme top post with 600 votes https://lemmy.ca/post/27666789

Quality content with 9 votes from the same day https://lemmy.ca/post/27685968

I'm unsure whether it's backend or frontend. I would guess both.

Describe the solution you'd like.

It could be similar to NSFW and language filters.

Ideally, I'd also like to block any user who upvotes those kinds of posts, as I do not want to interact with the kind of people who help proliferate that type of content. But that's probably more appropriate for a 3rd party addon after votes become public to everyone and "true block" gets implemented.

Describe alternatives you've considered.

Block all communities that upvote memes to the top. Unfortunately, this completely removes many communities I would otherwise be interested in.

Additional context

No response

@MaximilianKohler MaximilianKohler added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 26, 2024
@dullbananas
Copy link
Collaborator

An alternative solution is sorting methods that ignore votes from people whose age is too different from the viewer's age. This requires storing people's year of birth, which #4786 proposes.

@MaximilianKohler
Copy link
Author

I'm doubtful that this can be solved by calculating age differences. I also agree with Nutomic's comment in the linked issue that people are unlikely to share that information.

@dessalines
Copy link
Member

Another good way around this problem (IE a way to block meme content), would be to add a back-end filter that filters out all image-type url posts. That way you could avoid people having to explicitly tag things as memes, since people probably wouldn't anyway.

@MaximilianKohler
Copy link
Author

That way you could avoid people having to explicitly tag things as memes, since people probably wouldn't anyway

Doesn't it work quite well for NSFW content? Filtering image posts could be a good method though too.

BTW, here is a good blog that expands on the issue with low-quality content:

The Cargo Cult of The Ennui Engine https://medium.com/@max.p.schlienger/the-cargo-cult-of-the-ennui-engine-890c541cebcb

I think Reddit massively degraded itself when the admins purposely started pushing easily digestible, low-quality content in order to appeal to the mainstream, and thus get more users to sell advertisements to.

If any platform could fight against this, it would be one like Lemmy that is not focused on getting more customers to sell ads to.

@TheOneImprove
Copy link

Another good way around this problem (IE a way to block meme content), would be to add a back-end filter that filters out all image-type url posts.

Clients already implement filtering, a good example is summit for lemmy.

I don't think implementing a backend filter would be efficient.

@dessalines
Copy link
Member

@TheOneImprove Clients don't or shouldn't do their own filtering, they're using the back-end filters we provide.

@Sjmarf
Copy link

Sjmarf commented Sep 18, 2024

@dessalines Some clients do currently filter this themselves. It would be nice if filtering out image posts was available on the backend, so less API requests need to be made.

(Keyword filtering would also be nice)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: discovery enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants
@dessalines @Nutomic @MaximilianKohler @dullbananas @Sjmarf @TheOneImprove and others