Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporter Badge Brightness #2986

Open
ultrawidegamer opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Supporter Badge Brightness #2986

ultrawidegamer opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
content An issue relating to official content on the platform (default facets, interfaces, worlds).

Comments

@ultrawidegamer
Copy link

Describe the Underlying Issue

After switching the supporter badge to use a matcap, it still appears a bit too dark and dull but looks much more consistent overall.

To Reproduce

Look at the supporter badge and compare it to the rest of the badges

Expected Behavior

Supporter badge should have a similar brightness level to that of other badges

Screenshots / Video

2024-09-20 05 58 53

Additional Context

I have attached a couple of new proposed matcaps to use

First one where it is only slightly brighter than the original
Matcap1
2024-09-20 05 59 07

and second one which is my preferred one because it matches closer to that of the host star badge
Matcap2
2024-09-20 05 59 17

Reporters

ultrawidegamer
navy3001

@ultrawidegamer ultrawidegamer added the content An issue relating to official content on the platform (default facets, interfaces, worlds). label Sep 20, 2024
@shiftyscales
Copy link
Collaborator

The prior reported feedback was concerns over the material's appearance drastically changing depending on lighting conditions in the world- that was resolved.

In my opinion, the examples you posted look significantly worse than how the badge currently looks, and looses its intended metallic / shiny appearance.

There are also other badges with a dark palette in the official badge lineup, so I don't think there's anything that need be done here.

{9938F8F9-AA0A-4B23-B54B-A05ED0D80090}

@shiftyscales shiftyscales removed their assignment Sep 20, 2024
@stiefeljackal
Copy link

In my opinion, the examples you posted look significantly worse than how the badge currently looks, and looses its intended metallic / shiny appearance.

@shiftyscales Can you post examples from your end so that we can see the intended metallic, shiny appearance?

@TisFoolish
Copy link

I think what they mean is that Ultra's edits make the coin brighter, but less shiny.

To me the current comes across as a burnished bronze with Ultra's edits coming across as a toony, fake gold?

I think the current looks better than both what we had before and better than Ultra's edits, but i do wonder if the intent is supposed a burnished bronze.

How would it look with a realistic gold matcap?

@shiftyscales
Copy link
Collaborator

@stiefeljackal - @ultrawidegamer did so- it's the first image in the post. I was referring to the edits following, yes.

@stiefeljackal
Copy link

@stiefeljackal - @ultrawidegamer did so- it's the first image in the post. I was referring to the edits following, yes.

I see now. Thank you for the clarification.

@ultrawidegamer
Copy link
Author

@shiftyscales My main concern is the inconsistency in the appearance of the badge. Most badges don't use a dark color palette, and the current badge looks drastically different from what’s shown in the original post and the sessions tab.

original post
image

sessions tab
2024-09-15 18 13 24

I’m not against the badge having a stylized, shiny look, but it should maintain a consistent design across all areas to avoid confusion about what the badge represents.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content An issue relating to official content on the platform (default facets, interfaces, worlds).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants