Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternative Design Ideas #1

Open
bdring opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Alternative Design Ideas #1

bdring opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@bdring
Copy link
Owner

bdring commented May 22, 2019

It has been noted that other countries use different coaster sizes. There is a not a lot of flexibility in the current design, especially going to a larger diameter coaster.

The firmware can handle any size and probably accommodate other changes. If you are looking at a redesign, here are some thoughts.

  1. The board does not need to be part of the design. A simpler existing board could be used remotely or packaged within the base. I sell some on Tindie.

  2. The geared rotational bed is complex to model. Someone suggested a direct drive. That is probably doable without affecting quality. I would probably suggest a metal hub, rather that direct mounting of the 3D printed part. It is more likely to be concentric and could buffer the heat from the motor.

@fastriker
Copy link

I actually thought about a parameterized OpenSCAD model. Maybe also the gears can keep their size and an extra plate on top for the coaster lead to a constant gear transmission ratio. Then the board can also work for machines with different diameter.

@bdring
Copy link
Owner Author

bdring commented May 22, 2019

@fastriker You would need to increase the travel of the linear axis too. Maybe just move it out and increase the rod length.

@dereulenspiegel
Copy link

dereulenspiegel commented May 27, 2019

I am actually currently trying to solve this. I increased the height of the "big gear" and added inserts for magnets. Further I modeled a platform which can hold 107mm coasters (pretty standard in Germany) which also has inserts for 3 magnets. This would allow for swappable platforms. The height of the "arm tower" is also increased by 10mm, but I probably need to increase it more.
I am currently waiting for the PCBs and other parts to try a real world assembly. If this works as expected I will publish the changes.
You can see a picture of the updates assembly here

@fastriker
Copy link

@fastriker You would need to increase the travel of the linear axis too. Maybe just move it out and increase the rod length.

You are right - I didn't thought about that. But maybe it is also not always necessary to use the full space of the coaster.

I am actually currently trying to solve this. I increased the height of the "big gear" and added inserts for magnets. Further I modeled a platform which can hold 107mm coasters (pretty standard in Germany) which also has inserts for 3 magnets. This would allow for swappable platforms. The height of the "arm tower" is also increased by 10mm, but I probably need to increase it more.

That is also a nice quick solution - and also interesting for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants