Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test case fail on riscv64 #19

Open
yuzibo opened this issue Apr 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

test case fail on riscv64 #19

yuzibo opened this issue Apr 24, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@yuzibo
Copy link

yuzibo commented Apr 24, 2022

Hi, I am porting Debian package to riscv64 arch.
Here is basic buildd info of rust-fastval in Debian:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rust-fasteval
Now the buildd log on riscv64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-fasteval&arch=riscv64&ver=0.2.4-1&stamp=1650289636&raw=0
And the log is same with my local build on riscv64 hardware:

c-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/libfasteval-da6ed3a61e1082c9.rlib -C debuginfo=2 --cap-lints warn -C linker=riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -C link-arg=-Wl,-z,relro --remap-path-prefix /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=/usr/share/cargo/registry/fasteval-0.2.4`
    Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1m 54s
     Running `/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/target/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/fasteval-4b9cf3c38633e3ef`

running 3 tests
test parser::internal_tests::priv_tests ... ok
test parser::internal_tests::util ... ok
test parser::internal_tests::rem_no_panic ... ok

test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s

     Running `/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/target/riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/compile-f8df2945b86f1b68`

running 6 tests
test basics ... ok
test eval_macro ... ok
test custom_func ... ok
test slab_overflow ... ok
test double_neg ... ok
test all_instrs ... FAILED

failures:

---- all_instrs stdout ----
thread 'all_instrs' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
  left: `"CompileSlab{ instrs:{ 0:IUnsafeVar { name: \"x\", ptr: 0x?????????? }, 1:IUnsafeVar { name: \"y\", ptr: 0x?????????? } } }"`,
 right: `"CompileSlab{ instrs:{ 0:IUnsafeVar { name: \"x\", ptr: 0x???????????? }, 1:IUnsafeVar { name: \"y\", ptr: 0x???????????? } } }"`', tests/compile.rs:131:5
stack backtrace:
   0: rust_begin_unwind
             at /usr/src/rustc-1.58.1/library/std/src/panicking.rs:498:5
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
             at /usr/src/rustc-1.58.1/library/core/src/panicking.rs:107:14
   2: core::panicking::assert_failed_inner
   3: core::panicking::assert_failed
             at /usr/src/rustc-1.58.1/library/core/src/panicking.rs:145:5
   4: compile::unsafe_comp_chk
             at /usr/share/cargo/registry/fasteval-0.2.4/tests/compile.rs:131:5
   5: compile::all_instrs
             at /usr/share/cargo/registry/fasteval-0.2.4/tests/compile.rs:389:9
   6: compile::all_instrs::{{closure}}
             at /usr/share/cargo/registry/fasteval-0.2.4/tests/compile.rs:213:1
   7: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /usr/src/rustc-1.58.1/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
   8: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /usr/src/rustc-1.58.1/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.


failures:
    all_instrs

test result: FAILED. 5 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.12s

error: test failed, to rerun pass '--test compile'
dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo test --all --features unsafe-vars returned exit code 101
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:6: override_dh_auto_test] Error 25
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'

So, I think the the test case : assert_eq!(replace_addrs(format!("{:?}",slab.cs)), expect_fmt) is not support on riscv64 now.
This is just I guess.
Could you tell me how to debug this issue in order to support rust-fasteval run on riscv64. and if you need me to run more test case, please feel free let me kown, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant