You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question about the library threading model (both currently implemented and formally specified).
On server side, is there a guarantee that streamHandler is invoked on the same event loop thread as the associated parent QUIC channel handlers? I.e. is there a usual netty single-threadity guarantee between these two as the regular handlers have? Is such guarantee (if exists) just a current implementation detail, or is it a fully specified part of the API?
Is there a single-threading guarantee between handlers of different streams of same connection? Current implementation does offer this, but is this a part of the public API?
On server side, is there a way to schedule different QUIC connections to the different event loops? Or is the server forever forced to run everything on a single thread (including crypto)?
Is there more formally specified threading model? I.e. current implementation is the one thing, but API guarantees could be weaker to allow for future changes.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I have a question about the library threading model (both currently implemented and formally specified).
streamHandler
is invoked on the same event loop thread as the associated parent QUIC channel handlers? I.e. is there a usual netty single-threadity guarantee between these two as the regular handlers have? Is such guarantee (if exists) just a current implementation detail, or is it a fully specified part of the API?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions