panic on input *

[makemeunsee]

Hello,

This input * (without the double quotes) causes markdown::to_html to panic.

e.g.

fn main() {
    println!("{}", markdown::to_html("* "));
}

Just in case, I've pasted the stacktrace below.

Cheers, let me know if I can provide anything else to help.

thread 'main' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0', /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/parser/block/unordered_list.rs:84:44
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/std/src/panicking.rs:575:5
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/core/src/panicking.rs:65:14
2: core::panicking::panic_bounds_check
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/core/src/panicking.rs:150:5
3: <usize as core::slice::index::SliceIndex<[T]>>::index
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/core/src/slice/index.rs:259:10
4: core::slice::index::<impl core::ops::index::Index for [T]>::index
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/core/src/slice/index.rs:18:9
5: <alloc::vec::Vec<T,A> as core::ops::index::Index>::index
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:2736:9
6: markdown::parser::block::unordered_list::parse_unordered_list
at /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/parser/block/unordered_list.rs:84:44
7: markdown::parser::block::parse_block
at /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/parser/block/mod.rs:71:5
8: markdown::parser::block::parse_blocks
at /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/parser/block/mod.rs:27:15
9: markdown::parser::parse
at /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/parser/mod.rs:43:5
10: markdown::to_html
at /home/me/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/markdown-0.3.0/src/lib.rs:29:18
11: markdown_bug::main
at ./frontend/examples/markdown_bug.rs:2:20
12: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
at /rustc/96ddd32c4bfb1d78f0cd03eb068b1710a8cebeef/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:513:5

[ChristianMurphy]

@makemeunsee could you share a runnable example of the issue?
I tried the sample code you provided with version 1.0.0-alpha.5 and do not see a panic.

Runnable example https://www.rustexplorer.com/b#%2F*%0A%5Bdependencies%5D%0Amarkdown%20%3D%20%221.0.0-alpha.5%22%0A*%2F%0A%0Ause%20markdown%3B%0A%0Afn%20main()%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20println!(%22%7B%7D%22%2C%20markdown%3A%3Ato_html(%22*%20%22))%3B%0A%7D

source from example

/*
[dependencies]
markdown = "1.0.0-alpha.5"
*/

use markdown;

fn main() {
    println!("{}", markdown::to_html("* "));
}

[wooorm]

Wrong package. You’re using the old one, that has tons of problems. This is a completely new project with the same name.

[makemeunsee]

Oh, my bad! Thanks for pointing it out.

[makemeunsee]

Note:

https://crates.io/crates/markdown still advertises 0.3.0 as the latest, indicates it was last released 2 years ago.

The crates VS code plugin also points to 0.3.0 as the latest. If you have a way to force these external services, I believe it would help with the project visibility and potential confusion.

[wooorm]

There is no force. crates doesn’t show alpha releases by default.

[wooorm]

As far as I know, at least! If you know of a way to get around it, I’d love to hear

[makemeunsee]

No, I'm not aware of anything of the sort, unfortunately. How close do you think this crate is to not being alpha anymore? Do you have a roadmap for the v1? Curious and potentially happy to help...

[wooorm]

I want to switch unist nodes towards traits, so that ToString, children, children_mut, position, etc here would be traits, which mdast/hast implement. That’s the only breaking change (perhaps also GH-40) I’d want to do first!

If you want to work on that, that would be much appreciated!

[makemeunsee]

I started having a look and trying to wrap my head around the problem/intent.

Is there already an issue open where to discuss? I found about this comment of yours but it's just a mention of this plan, not the dedicate channel to discuss it, no?

[wooorm]

No, there is no particular issue or dedicated channel. Feel free to open one or discuss here!