fix: close 5315 #5316
fix: close 5315 #5316
Conversation
|
@rxliuli is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new function, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Your build has completed! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/utils/model.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/utils/model.ts (2)
Line range hint
65-130: Function integration looks good, suggest performance review.The integration of
parseModelNameintocollectModelTablesimplifies the parsing logic and improves maintainability. However, consider reviewing the performance, especially how the function scales with a large number of models and complex model names. Potential areas to optimize could include reducing the number of regex operations or caching frequently accessed data.The changes to the function are approved.
Consider running performance benchmarks to ensure that the changes do not negatively impact the application's performance. If needed, I can assist in setting up these benchmarks.
Line range hint
1-250: Overall file structure and consistency are commendable.The file is well-organized, and the use of helper functions and constants enhances readability and modularity. The consistent naming conventions and structured approach to handling models are in line with best practices.
The overall structure and consistency of the file are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/utils/model.ts (2)
Line range hint
102-130: Enhanced model handling logic.The refactoring of
collectModelTableto utilizeparseModelNamefor parsing model names simplifies its logic significantly. This change not only makes the code cleaner but also ensures that the parsing logic is consistent across different parts of the application.However, the logic inside the loop that handles the model configuration could be further optimized. Currently, the function
parseModelNameis called twice for the samenamein different conditions (lines 107 and 130). This is inefficient as it processes the same string twice in scenarios where the model does not exist initially.Consider caching the result of
parseModelNameoutside the loop or restructuring the logic to avoid redundant parsing.Optimize the function to avoid redundant parsing by caching the result of
parseModelNamefor each name before entering the loop.
Line range hint
149-168: Optimize default model handling.The function
collectModelTableWithDefaultModeleffectively sets the default model, but it could be optimized to reduce unnecessary processing. Currently, it callscollectModelTableand then iterates over the results to set the default model. This could be integrated into a single loop to improve efficiency.Consider modifying
collectModelTableto accept an optional default model parameter, which would allow setting the default model within the same loop that builds the model table, thus reducing the need for a separate iteration.Integrate the default model setting into the
collectModelTablefunction to optimize performance and reduce redundancy.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/utils/model.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
app/utils/model.ts (3)
Line range hint
176-183: Well-structured model collection.The function
collectModelseffectively organizes the models by leveragingcollectModelTableandsortModelTable. This modular approach enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.The changes are approved as they maintain the functionality and improve code structure.
Line range hint
185-192: Effective integration of default model.The function
collectModelsWithDefaultModelextends the functionality ofcollectModelsby incorporating a default model setting. This addition is seamlessly integrated and maintains the consistency of the application's logic.The changes are approved as they enhance functionality without compromising existing logic.
Line range hint
194-201: Correct model availability check.The function
isModelAvailableInServercorrectly checks the availability of a model based on its full name and provider. This is an essential functionality for the application, ensuring that only available models are used.The implementation is correct and meets the requirements.
app/utils/model.ts
Outdated
| function parseModelName(name: string): { | ||
| customModelName: string; | ||
| customProviderName: string; | ||
| } { | ||
| let customModelName, customProviderName; | ||
| if (name.startsWith("'") || name.startsWith('"')) { | ||
| const match = name.match(/^(['"])(.*?)\1(@.*)?$/); | ||
| if (match) { | ||
| customModelName = match[2]; | ||
| customProviderName = match[3]?.slice(1) || customModelName; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| [customModelName, customProviderName] = name.split("@"); | ||
| } | ||
| return { customModelName, customProviderName } as { | ||
| customModelName: string; | ||
| customProviderName: string; | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor and improve parsing logic.
The introduction of parseModelName function is a significant improvement. It centralizes the parsing logic for model names, which is crucial given the bug fix for handling "@" in model names. The function handles various cases, including quoted strings and strings with or without "@". This not only fixes the bug but also enhances the maintainability of the code by isolating this logic into a single function.
However, as previously commented, adding unit tests for this function would ensure its robustness, especially for edge cases. It's crucial to test various scenarios including names with special characters, multiple "@" symbols, and incorrect formats to prevent future bugs.
The function implementation is approved.
Would you like me to help with writing these unit tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rxliuli, I've written the unit tests for the parseModelName function. Below are the test cases that cover various scenarios to ensure the function's robustness:
import { parseModelName } from './model';
describe('parseModelName', () => {
it('should parse a simple model name without "@"', () => {
const result = parseModelName('simpleModel');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'simpleModel',
customProviderName: undefined,
});
});
it('should parse a model name with "@"', () => {
const result = parseModelName('modelName@providerName');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'modelName',
customProviderName: 'providerName',
});
});
it('should parse a quoted model name without "@"', () => {
const result = parseModelName('"quotedModel"');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'quotedModel',
customProviderName: 'quotedModel',
});
});
it('should parse a quoted model name with "@"', () => {
const result = parseModelName('"quotedModel@providerName"');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'quotedModel@providerName',
customProviderName: 'quotedModel@providerName',
});
});
it('should parse a model name with multiple "@" symbols', () => {
const result = parseModelName('modelName@providerName@extra');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'modelName',
customProviderName: 'providerName@extra',
});
});
it('should handle incorrect format gracefully', () => {
const result = parseModelName('incorrectFormat@');
expect(result).toEqual({
customModelName: 'incorrectFormat',
customProviderName: '',
});
});
});These tests cover the basic cases, quoted names, names with "@" symbols, and some edge cases like multiple "@" symbols and incorrect formats. This should provide good coverage for the parseModelName function.
Would you like to proceed with these tests, or do you need any further modifications?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
- app/utils/tests/model.test.ts (1 hunks)
- app/utils/model.ts (3 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/utils/model.ts
Additional comments not posted (2)
package.json (2)
19-19: Addition of Test Script CommandThe new
"test": "vitest run"script command is a valuable addition, enhancing the development workflow by providing a straightforward way to run tests using the Vitest framework.The addition of this script command is approved as it aligns with modern JavaScript development practices.
70-70: Inclusion of Vitest DependencyAdding
"vitest": "^2.0.5"to the dependencies section is crucial for enabling the newly added test script command. This change is appropriate and ensures that the necessary packages are available for running tests.The inclusion of the Vitest dependency is approved, and it is correctly specified with a version constraint to ensure compatibility.
| describe("parseModelName", () => { | ||
| it('should parse a simple model name without "@"', () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName("simpleModel"); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "simpleModel", | ||
| customProviderName: "", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should parse a model name with "@"', () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName("modelName@providerName"); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "modelName", | ||
| customProviderName: "providerName", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should parse a quoted model name without "@"', () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName('"quotedModel"'); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "quotedModel", | ||
| customProviderName: "quotedModel", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should parse a quoted model name with "@"', () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName('"quotedModel@providerName"'); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "quotedModel@providerName", | ||
| customProviderName: "quotedModel@providerName", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should parse a model name with multiple "@" symbols', () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName("modelName@providerName@extra"); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "modelName", | ||
| customProviderName: "providerName@extra", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it("should handle incorrect format gracefully", () => { | ||
| const result = parseModelName("incorrectFormat@"); | ||
| expect(result).toEqual({ | ||
| customModelName: "incorrectFormat", | ||
| customProviderName: "", | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of Unit Tests for parseModelName Function
-
Simple Model Name Test (Lines 5-11): This test is well-implemented and correctly checks for a model name without the "@" symbol.
-
Model Name with "@" Test (Lines 13-19): The test correctly handles model names with an "@" symbol, splitting it into
customModelNameandcustomProviderName. -
Quoted Model Name without "@" Test (Lines 21-27): The expected result seems incorrect. The
customProviderNameshould not be the same ascustomModelNameif the "@" symbol is absent. -
Quoted Model Name with "@" Test (Lines 29-35): This test incorrectly expects the entire input as both
customModelNameandcustomProviderName. The function should ideally split the name at the "@" symbol. -
Multiple "@" Symbols Test (Lines 37-43): This test is correct and handles multiple "@" symbols appropriately, assigning the first part to
customModelNameand the rest tocustomProviderName. -
Incorrect Format Test (Lines 45-51): This test handles an edge case where the format is incorrect but could be more robust by testing more malformed inputs.
- The tests for quoted model names (Lines 21-35) have incorrect expectations. Consider revising the expected results to accurately reflect the function's behavior.
- Enhance the robustness of the incorrect format test by including more edge cases.
Consider using parameterized tests to reduce redundancy and cover more scenarios with less code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/components/model-config.tsx (2)
9-11: Add a comment explaining the purpose of the function.While the function is straightforward, adding a brief comment explaining its purpose would enhance maintainability.
+// Formats the model name and provider name into a single string using a custom delimiter ("----"). function getModelName(model: { model: string; providerName: string }) { return `${model.model}----${model.providerName}`; }
Line range hint
18-27: Add error handling for the split operation.To ensure robustness, add error handling for the split operation in case the value does not contain the expected delimiter.
const [model, providerName] = e.currentTarget.value.split("----"); +if (!model || !providerName) { + // Handle the error case, e.g., show an error message or set default values + return; +} props.updateConfig((config) => { config.model = ModalConfigValidator.model(model); config.providerName = providerName as ServiceProvider; });
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/components/model-config.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/components/model-config.tsx (1)
37-43: LGTM!The changes ensure consistency in the formatting of model identifiers.
The code changes are approved.
💻 变更类型 | Change Type
🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change
📝 补充信息 | Additional Information
close #5315
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements