Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing return value in divexact! methods #1858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Also simplify a divexact method

Also simplify a divexact method
Copy link
Collaborator

@lgoettgens lgoettgens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but wait for downstream tests

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.21%. Comparing base (59d6a4f) to head (507e148).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/HeckeMoreStuff.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1858      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.25%   86.21%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines       36031    36030       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        31077    31063      -14     
- Misses       4954     4967      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lgoettgens lgoettgens closed this Sep 20, 2024
@lgoettgens lgoettgens reopened this Sep 20, 2024
@lgoettgens lgoettgens enabled auto-merge (squash) September 20, 2024 17:48
@lgoettgens lgoettgens merged commit 7aa54e0 into Nemocas:master Sep 20, 2024
46 of 48 checks passed
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the mh/fix-divexact-return branch September 20, 2024 19:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants