Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Newsletter: The secrets of growth engineers #9363

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ivanagas
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Next newsletter just dropped

Checklist

  • Words are spelled using American English
  • Titles are in sentence case
  • Feature names are in sentence case too
  • Use relative URLs for internal links

Article checklist

  • I've added (at least) 3-5 internal links to this new article
  • I've added keywords for this page to the rank tracker in Ahrefs
  • I've checked the preview build of the article
  • The date on the article is today's date

Useful resources

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 16, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
posthog ❌ Failed (Inspect) Sep 19, 2024 7:12pm

Copy link
Contributor

@andyvan-ph andyvan-ph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

High level feedback:

  • I like the format and points in this, though maybe we need to go one level deeper somehow? I can't quite put my finger on it, but maybe the takeaways feel a little vague. Rather than "think about X" it's more like "go try this" and being a bit more explicit?

  • I feel like it's lacking at least one good example from something we've done at PostHog. This would add some credibility plus make it feel more specific to us, rather than a general guide anyone could have published. Could we come up with one example for each point, even if it's hypothetical "this is what this looks like" type example?

  • I wouldn't normally say this, but I feel like it might need some kind of conclusion? Either that, or one more point to feel a little more complete? I don't feel so strongly about this, though. Adding some examples elsewhere might be enough.

  • Let's get some custom art for this. We've used the "experiment hog" enough already!

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
---
title: The secrets of growth engineers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'How to think like a growth engineer' tested well in the poll. 'How growth engineers think' could work well, too.

Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 14 04 37


The tradeoff is caring less about products, features, roadmaps, and user requests. They let the metrics be their north star and do whatever, wherever to improve it. Instead of doing what they feel is right or the roadmap set by someone else, they work trying to improve the metrics.

> **Takeaway for software engineers:** What are the growth metrics of what you are working on? Understand your key flow [conversion](/docs/product-analytics/funnels), activation, and [retention](/docs/product-analytics/retention). You can use a framework like [AARRR](/product-engineers/aarrr-pirate-funnel) or [growth loops](/product-engineers/growth-loops) to model this.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • We should remove the "for software engineers" here. It's useful for anyone in product roles, so need to limit the audience.

  • To add something visual, could we add a graphic of a growth loop between these two sections with a caption?


Growth engineers capture these gains through their unique way of thinking and working. Luckily, you don't need to go to growth engineer school to learn this yourself. If you aspire to create a successful product and business, you should care about what growth engineers do to make that happen, and this post aims to help you do just that.

## 1. Being data-driven is a cliche, but it's also a way of life
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depending on the headline we choose, we should tweak these headlines so they match up.


> **Takeaway for software engineers:** What are areas of your work that could leverage more of an experimentation mindset? Could you be more pragmatic and iterate on a hypothesis instead of just shipping the next feature on your list?

## 3. How growth engineers figure out what to work on
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe change to be something "Hunting wins < fixing problems"

@charlescook-ph
Copy link
Collaborator

I like the format and points in this, though maybe we need to go one level deeper somehow? I can't quite put my finger on it, but maybe the takeaways feel a little vague. Rather than "think about X" it's more like "go try this" and being a bit more explicit?

Yeah I agree with this, I wonder if it's because I'm reading it as a bit too general 'this is what growth engineers do' rather than 'as a software engineer, these are things you should steal to be a better engineer'?

@ivanagas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm using rockethog as cover for now:

growth2

@ivanagas
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Make takeaways more actionable.
  • Added a couple examples from us at PostHog
  • Added more visuals
  • Changed headline

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants