Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: Add section about complementary Slicer Extensions #14

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jhlegarreta
Copy link
Contributor

Add section about complementary Slicer Extensions.

Copy link
Member

@ljod ljod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Jon! The SlicerWMA is not active please remove. Ideally we want all these complementary modules to be installed when someone installs SlicerDMRI

@jhlegarreta jhlegarreta force-pushed the AddComplementaryExtensionsDoc branch from 061dd4a to 245abec Compare August 3, 2023 15:18
@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhlegarreta commented Aug 3, 2023

The SlicerWMA is not active please remove.

Done in 245abec.

Ideally we want all these complementary modules to be installed when someone installs SlicerDMRI

For this, it would be nice to have like a "meta-package", or "meta-extension" option of (strictly) non-dependent extensions that belong to the same family or ecosystem. However, introducing these dependencies will have the downsides discussed in Slicer/ExtensionsIndex#1963. There is no such "meta-package", or "meta-extension" mechanism for now, so adding the section here is an intermediate step towards making users aware of the rest of packages that add nice features to SlicerDMRI.

docs/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Add section about complementary Slicer Extensions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants