Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: use upstream release #1829

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: use upstream release #1829

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

casperdcl
Copy link
Member

@casperdcl casperdcl commented Jun 11, 2024

Bump docs dependencies

Testing you performed

See CI

Related issues/links

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have added docstrings in line with the guidance in the developer guide
  • I have updated the relevant documentation
  • I have implemented unit tests that cover any new or modified functionality
  • CHANGELOG.md has been updated with any functionality change
  • Request review from all relevant developers
  • Change pull request label to 'Waiting for review'

Contribution Notes

Please read and adhere to the developer guide and local patterns and conventions.

  • The content of this Pull Request (the Contribution) is intentionally submitted for inclusion in CIL (the Work) under the terms and conditions of the Apache-2.0 License
  • I confirm that the contribution does not violate any intellectual property rights of third parties

@casperdcl
Copy link
Member Author

currently failing due to:

The following packages are incompatible
├─ pydata-sphinx-theme >=0.15.3  is installable and it requires
│  └─ sphinx >=5.0 , which can be installed;
└─ sphinx-panels is not installable because there are no viable options
   ├─ sphinx-panels [0.5.1|0.5.2] would require
   │  └─ sphinx >=2,<4 , which conflicts with any installable versions previously reported;
   └─ sphinx-panels 0.6.0 would require
      └─ sphinx >=2,<5 , which conflicts with any installable versions previously reported.

@jakobsj
Copy link
Contributor

jakobsj commented Jul 3, 2024

@casperdcl I recommend requesting reviews from specific individuals rather than a group to progress this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: PRs to review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants