Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coq-mathcomp-algebra-tactics conflicts with coq-mathcomp-word.2.0 #2452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2023

Conversation

LasseBlaauwbroek
Copy link
Member

Note: These are not my packages

Starting with coq-mathcomp-word 2.0, this package lives in the namespace mathcomp.word, and it includes a file ssrZ that conflicts with a corresponding file from coq-mathcomp-zify. See
jasmin-lang/coqword#15 for the discussion upstream.

coq-mathcomp-algebra-tactics <= 1.0.0 imports ssrZ while only qualifying mathcomp and not mathcomp.zify. This has been fixed in dev, but is still a problem for the released packages:
https://github.com/math-comp/algebra-tactics/blob/fb87fb0434c17e825b22e3bac9904c8e4f6cd1c2/theories/ring.v#L5

We declare a conflict with coq-mathcomp-word.2.0 to resolve this.

Note: These are not my packages

Starting with `coq-mathcomp-word` `2.0`, this package lives in the namespace
`mathcomp.word`, and it includes a file `ssrZ` that conflicts with a
corresponding file from `coq-mathcomp-zify`. See
jasmin-lang/coqword#15 for the discussion upstream.

`coq-mathcomp-algebra-tactics <= 1.0.0` imports `ssrZ` while only qualifying
`mathcomp` and not `mathcomp.zify`. This has been fixed in `dev`, but is still a
problem for the released packages:
https://github.com/math-comp/algebra-tactics/blob/fb87fb0434c17e825b22e3bac9904c8e4f6cd1c2/theories/ring.v#L5

We declare a conflict with `coq-mathcomp-word.2.0` to resolve this.
@silene
Copy link
Contributor

silene commented Jan 26, 2023

Seems like the failure is due to the usual Dune bug, so merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants