Support linked correction proposals through LSP snippet syntax #3229
Conversation
hopehadfield
force-pushed
the
3686-linked-proposal
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0c8e0a6
to
93cbd4b
Compare
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ipse.jdt.ls.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/ls/core/internal/handlers/CodeActionResolveHandler.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
hopehadfield
force-pushed
the
3686-linked-proposal
branch
from
2a1a4bb
to
5c817e7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is ready for merging after we release. We've tested quite a bit and there's some subsequent changes that would depend on this (not to mention maybe upstreaming the snippet edit class into lsp4j, applying your RHS type-mismatch, and expanding the set of things that can correctly use this.
|
retest this please. |
rgrunber
changed the title
| @@ -195,6 +195,10 @@ public boolean isWorkspaceApplyEditSupported() { | |||
| return capabilities.getWorkspace() != null && isTrue(capabilities.getWorkspace().getApplyEdit()); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| public boolean isWorkspaceSnippetEditSupported() { | |||
| return Boolean.parseBoolean(extendedClientCapabilities.getOrDefault("snippetEditSupport", "false").toString()); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be possible to use the standard workspaceEdit.snippetEditSupport capability here to make this work out of the box for clients supporting the 3.18 spec addition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, but it needs to be added to https://github.com/eclipse-lsp4j/lsp4j/blob/main/org.eclipse.lsp4j/src/main/java/org/eclipse/lsp4j/Protocol.xtend#L59 . @hopehadfield started this at eclipse-lsp4j/lsp4j#847 .
Fixes redhat-developer/vscode-java#3686
redhat-developer/vscode-java#3730