Add support for ASGI pathsend extension
#2671
Open
+150
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gi0baro
force-pushed
the
asgi-pathsend-rework
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2bbda0a
to
ddfc5c0
Compare
adriangb
reviewed
Aug 26, 2024
gi0baro
force-pushed
the
asgi-pathsend-rework
branch
from
ddfc5c0
to
9286c83
Compare
gi0baro
force-pushed
the
asgi-pathsend-rework
branch
from
9286c83
to
4631efb
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
As per title, this adds support for ASGI pathsend extension on
FileResponseclass for servers implementing it.This is a re-work of #2435 combined with parts of #2616, as discussed in #2613 with @Kludex.
Checklist