Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of surrogate problem subclasses #2607

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

esantorella
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: These are no longer doing anything distinctive. The proper way to check if a problem is using a surrogate is to check the type of its runner.

Differential Revision: D60285442

esantorella and others added 6 commits July 26, 2024 05:37
…k#2603)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2603

Context: Surrogate benchmark problems allow for downloading datasets and constructing a surrogate lazily. Since the surrogates and datasets are only needed for the `Runner`, it makes sense to confine this logic to `SurrogateRunner`. This gives surrogate benchmark problems an interface that is much clsoer to that of non-surrogate benchmark problems. In the future, we should be able to get down to just one `BenchmarkProblem` class.

This PR:
* Moves lazy construction of surrogates from the `Problem` to the `Runner`.
* Moves corresponding unit tests from the problem's file to the runner's.

Differential Revision: D60266288
…eritance (facebook#2601)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2601

Context:
* Problems that lack an `optimal_value` get a NaN score and cannot really be used for benchmarking except when aggregated. This is a nasty "gotcha." We don't always know the optimum, but IMO it is better to guess.
* The inheritance structure of benchmark problems is too complex and will make subsequent refactors harder.

This PR:
* Adds an `optimal_value` requirement to `BenchmarkProblem` and makes `BenchmarkProblem` the base class to `SurrogateBenchmarkProblem`, enabling `BenchmarkProblem` to be the only type annotation needed. Therefore, the type annotation `BenchmarkProblemProtocol` is no longer necessary. It will be removed in the next PR.
* No longer allows for giving an NaN score to benchmarks where the problem lacks an optimal value, because this won't happen.
* Updates a lot of annotations.
* Raises an exception for constrained multi-objective problems.
* Use dataclasses to cut down on code.

Differential Revision: D60145193

Reviewed By: saitcakmak
…e annotations (facebook#2602)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2602

These are no longer necessary. See previous PR for context. This change reaps them and updates type annotations.

Differential Revision: D60146081

Reviewed By: saitcakmak
Summary:
Context: Benchmark problems are sometimes created with class methods `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch`, `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_synthetic`, and `MultiObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_multi_objective`, the former two now being identical. This creates the need for some tricky type annotations; to me, replacing these with functions is obviously cleaner. This will make it easier to consolidate classes in the future.

This PR:
* Replaces `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch` and `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_synthetic` with `create_single_objective_problem_from_botorch`
* Replaces `MultiObjectiveBenchmarkProblem.from_botorch_multi_objective` with `create_multi_objective_problem_from_botorch`

Differential Revision: D60284484
Summary:
The class is not adding anything. We should check if problems are single-objective by looking at the type of their `optimization_config`.

This PR:
* Removes `SingleObjectiveBenchmarkProblem`
* Replaces all references to it with `BenchmarkProblem`
* Removes `get_benchmark_problem`, which is redundant with `get_single_objective_benchmark_problem`

Differential Revision: D60285191
Summary: These are no longer doing anything distinctive. The proper way to check if a problem is using a surrogate is to check the type of its runner.

Differential Revision: D60285442
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Jul 26, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60285442

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants