Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_advisor_suppression #26177

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor

@jkroepke jkroepke commented Jun 1, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This resources takes care of advisor suppressions.

API Ref: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/advisor/suppressions?view=rest-advisor-2023-01-01

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
==> Checking that Custom Timeouts are used...
==> Checking that acceptance test packages are used...
TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/advisor '-run=TestAccAnalysisServicesServer_basic' -timeout 300m -ldflags="-X=github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN   TestAccAnalysisServicesServer_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAnalysisServicesServer_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAnalysisServicesServer_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAnalysisServicesServer_basic (39.60s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/advisor	39.703s

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • New Resource: azurerm_advisor_suppression [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @jkroepke - Thanks for this PR. We are moving away from this style of resource for new resources in favour of "Typed" resource as per the contributor docs here: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/main/contributing/topics/best-practices.md#typed-vs-untyped-resources
can you take a look at implementing this as a Typed resource?

Additionally, we'd need this PR splitting into separate PRs for the multiple purposes here, i.e. one for updating the API version, one for the additional property support, and of course this one for the new resource.

If you can take a look at those changes, we can continue review.

Thanks

@jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroepke commented Jun 3, 2024

Hey @jackofallops do you have any example for where a service directory contains both styles of resources?

@jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroepke commented Jun 3, 2024

API Update #26205

@jackofallops
Copy link
Member

Hey @jackofallops do you have any example for where a service directory contains both styles of resources?

Hi @jkroepke - Quite a few services make use of both types at present, for example: applicationinsights and containers
Hope that helps?

@jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroepke commented Jun 4, 2024

additional property support: #26220

@jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroepke commented Jun 5, 2024

Hey @jackofallops

I rewrite the resource based on the given example. Please take a look

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

This PR is being labeled as "stale" because it has not been updated for 30 or more days.

If this PR is still valid, please remove the "stale" label. If this PR is blocked, please add it to the "Blocked" milestone.

If you need some help completing this PR, please leave a comment letting us know. Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Aug 5, 2024
@jkroepke
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkroepke commented Aug 5, 2024

@katbyte i'm waiting for an response

About CI: I run go mod tidy / go mod vendor locally and I have nothing to commit

Signed-off-by: Jan-Otto Kröpke <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay @jkroepke - i think describing the format is fine, i've done so and LGTM now 🔬

@katbyte katbyte merged commit ccec080 into hashicorp:main Sep 20, 2024
32 checks passed
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.3.0 milestone Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants