Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update exterior_algebra #4093

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

See the commit messages for more details to the changes.
This does not change anything large, just unifies and cleans up a bit.

- unify functions for coefficient field and ring (while still using singular in the former case)
- use `@varnames_interface`
- re-structure tests
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.69%. Comparing base (0b52e65) to head (e74b92e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
experimental/ExteriorAlgebra/test/runtests.jl 92.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4093      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.69%   84.69%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         614      614              
  Lines       83568    83568              
==========================================
- Hits        70780    70776       -4     
- Misses      12788    12792       +4     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...xperimental/ExteriorAlgebra/src/ExteriorAlgebra.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Rings/PBWAlgebraQuo.jl 85.84% <100.00%> (ø)
experimental/ExteriorAlgebra/test/runtests.jl 90.90% <92.00%> (-5.87%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member Author

Can we merge this in the meantime, even though the implementation in #4097 seems superior? This PR contains some small improvements that @HechtiDerLachs could then use in the user-facing constructors in #4097 as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant