Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Use reusable-reviewer-lottery from ros2_control_ci #186

Merged

Conversation

christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor

@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich commented Feb 17, 2024

Fixes #185, see ros-controls/ros2_control#1402 for more details.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f6f71e0) 50.10% compared to head (a993fab) 50.10%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           ros2-master     #186   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        50.10%   50.10%           
============================================
  Files               10       10           
  Lines              497      497           
  Branches           166      167    +1     
============================================
  Hits               249      249           
  Misses             217      217           
  Partials            31       31           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 50.10% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Member

@saikishor saikishor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 01da615 into ros-controls:ros2-master Mar 4, 2024
19 checks passed
@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich deleted the reviewer_lottery branch April 4, 2024 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants