Support for a scalable simd representation #118917

JamieCunliffe · 2023-12-13T16:38:34Z

As requested here the changes required to allow for scalable vector types to be represented.

A few of the restrictions on the types that are stated in the RFC haven't yet been implemented. I'll make a start on those, but I thought it would be worth getting some comments on some of the fundamental changes in here sooner rather than later.

r? @Amanieu

Noratrieb · 2023-12-13T17:13:34Z

cc @rust-lang/types for awareness about proposed scalable SIMD types, which are proposed to contain several major type system special cases. See the RFC linked in the description for more details.

compiler-errors · 2023-12-13T19:22:36Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/check.rs

@@ -122,7 +122,14 @@ pub(super) fn check_fn<'a, 'tcx>(
        hir::FnRetTy::DefaultReturn(_) => body.value.span,
        hir::FnRetTy::Return(ty) => ty.span,
    };
-    fcx.require_type_is_sized(declared_ret_ty, return_or_body_span, traits::SizedReturnType);
+
+    if !declared_ret_ty.is_scalable_simd() {


This needs a TODO to make sure it's not accidentally committed.

This should allow scalable simd parameters without requiring params_can_be_unsized.

Yeah, but it specifically says:

for now just remove the check for testing purposes.

So it either needs a TODO to remove this once "testing purposes" are over, or the comment should be reworked to explain why it's correct that makes it seem less temporary.

compiler-errors

Just some questions that I had, I know this is still a draft -- just want to not forget + also be subscribed to this PR 😜

compiler-errors · 2023-12-13T19:22:42Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs

@@ -583,7 +583,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                infer::BoundRegionConversionTime::FnCall,
                fn_sig.output(),
            );
-            self.require_type_is_sized_deferred(output, expr.span, traits::SizedReturnType);
+            if !output.is_scalable_simd() {


compiler-errors · 2023-12-13T19:22:58Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/lib.rs

@@ -265,7 +265,10 @@ fn typeck_with_fallback<'tcx>(

    for (ty, span, code) in fcx.deferred_sized_obligations.borrow_mut().drain(..) {
        let ty = fcx.normalize(span, ty);
-        fcx.require_type_is_sized(ty, span, code);
+        // ScalableSIMD: Justify this.


Needs a TODO or a very detailed explanation here

This check should be moved to the call sites of require_type_is_sized_deferred.

compiler-errors · 2023-12-13T19:23:40Z

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/sty.rs

@@ -2874,6 +2888,10 @@ impl<'tcx> Ty<'tcx> {
    /// This is mostly useful for optimizations, as these are the types
    /// on which we can replace cloning with dereferencing.
    pub fn is_trivially_pure_clone_copy(self) -> bool {
+        if self.is_scalable_simd() {


Why is this true?

Actually, for the record, this is unsound. For a type to implement Copy, it must implement Sized, since Sized is one of Copy's supertraits.

Yes, that's one of the problems we have with these types. We need them to be Copy but we can't implement the trait due to the bounds. These types should be trivially copyable as they are just a register and (for SVE anyway) can be copied with a mov instruction. It was a discussion with @Amanieu a while ago that lead to this approach, I'm definitely open to alternative suggestions as to how this could be done though.

This should probably be moved to is_copy_modulo_regions. Possibly further up, since it might depend on what the callers of that function are checking.

is_copy_modulo_regions must agree with the implementation of Copy. As I said before, these types cannot implement Copy soundly while also being unsized.

Then perhaps this exception should be moved up to the callers of is_copy_modulo_regions where we can get a better idea of what special handling is needed.

Given that these types also have the requirements to only be used in registers, I would expect that trying to use too many if these variables at the same time is likely also not supported 🤔 Looking at the RFC I don't fully understand the requirements for these types, both the questions by RalfJ, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3268/files#r1500263066, but also why is it ok to reference them if they may only be stored in registers?

How does LLVM model svfloat64_t types? I would expect them to encounter many of the same issues? edit: I found https://llvm.org/devmtg/2021-11/slides/2021-OptimizingCodeForScalableVectorArchitectures.pdf 🤔 they made a breaking change to how they store type sizes?

if references to these simd registers are apparently ok and you also want their scope to be limited, could something like teh following work (where these simd registers are extern types with special behavior during codegen)

// An invariant token,similar to `scoped_threads` in std #[derive(Copy, Clone) struct Scope<'scope>(Phantomdata<*mut &'scope ()>); fn sve_scope<F: for<'scope> Fn(Scope<'scope>) -> R>(f: F) -> R; extern { type svbool<'scope>; } impl<'scope> Scope<'scope> { fn whilelt_b64(self, ..) -> &'scope mut svbool<'scope>; // ... }

Given that I don't fully understand the constraints here there may definitely be issues with this approach

This should be removed.

bjorn3 · 2023-12-13T19:55:43Z

compiler/rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs

@@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ declare_features! (
    (internal, prelude_import, "1.2.0", None, None),
    /// Used to identify crates that contain the profiler runtime.
    (internal, profiler_runtime, "1.18.0", None, None),
+    /// Allows the use of scalable SIMD types.
+    (unstable, repr_scalable, "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION", None, None),


This should get a tracking issue and moved to the feature-group-start: actual feature gates section.

Also if the version you end up landing is not entirely complete, it should be marked as incomplete instead of unstable.

bjorn3 · 2023-12-13T19:58:32Z

tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-repr-scalable.rs

+
+#[repr(simd, scalable(16))] //~ error: Scalable SIMD types are experimental
+struct Foo {
+    _ty: [i8; 0],


This type is a lie and will give issues for Foo { _ty: [] }. Maybe use _ty: [i8] instead? That will also automatically mark it as !Sized.

bjorn3 · 2023-12-13T20:01:52Z

compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/mod.rs

@@ -422,6 +426,11 @@ impl<'a, Ty> TyAndLayout<'a, Ty> {
                }))
            }

+            Abi::ScalableVector { .. } => Ok(HomogeneousAggregate::Homogeneous(Reg {
+                kind: RegKind::ScalableVector,
+                size: Size::from_bits(128),


This size is a lie. Would panicking or returning Err instead work? Or is it genuinely possible for a struct that is passed as argument to contain a scalable vector?

In the RFC I did state that these types can't be inside a struct (currently no checking to enforce that though). We might want to relax that in the future though. Currently we could panic or return an error here, I'll make this an error for now.

bjorn3 · 2023-12-13T20:07:36Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/debuginfo.rs

@@ -370,6 +370,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
                if attrs.flags.contains(CodegenFnAttrFlags::NAKED) {
                    return;
                }
+                // FIXME: Don't spill scalable simd, this works for most of them however,
+                // some intermediate types can't be spilled e.g. `<vscale x 4 x i1>`


I'm pretty sure even with this change, we do end up putting every value that cg_ssa couldn't determine as having a single assignment on the stack anyway.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T14:27:41Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/abi.rs

@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ impl LlvmType for Reg {
                _ => bug!("unsupported float: {:?}", self),
            },
            RegKind::Vector => cx.type_vector(cx.type_i8(), self.size.bytes()),
+            RegKind::ScalableVector => cx.type_scalable_vector(cx.type_i8(), 16),


Could use a comment.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T14:34:14Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/intrinsic.rs

@@ -1176,12 +1197,16 @@ fn generic_simd_intrinsic<'ll, 'tcx>(
            InvalidMonomorphization::MismatchedLengths { span, name, m_len, v_len }
        );
        match m_elem_ty.kind() {
-            ty::Int(_) => {}
+            ty::Int(_) | ty::Bool => {}


Could use a comment explaining this is for svbool_t.

Why is this change Arm SVE specific? RISC-V RVV also has scalable bool vector types. I don't think we need to make this comment target specific. We want to support scalable vectors of bool element type.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T14:50:13Z

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/check.rs

@@ -831,13 +831,13 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
    }
 }

-pub fn check_simd(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, sp: Span, def_id: LocalDefId) {
+pub fn check_simd(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, sp: Span, def_id: LocalDefId, is_scalable: bool) {


This needs to be reworked to check for _ty: [T] which must be an unsized slice.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T14:55:08Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/check.rs

@@ -122,7 +122,14 @@ pub(super) fn check_fn<'a, 'tcx>(
        hir::FnRetTy::DefaultReturn(_) => body.value.span,
        hir::FnRetTy::Return(ty) => ty.span,
    };
-    fcx.require_type_is_sized(declared_ret_ty, return_or_body_span, traits::SizedReturnType);
+
+    if !declared_ret_ty.is_scalable_simd() {


This should allow scalable simd parameters without requiring params_can_be_unsized.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:04:42Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/lib.rs

@@ -265,7 +265,10 @@ fn typeck_with_fallback<'tcx>(

    for (ty, span, code) in fcx.deferred_sized_obligations.borrow_mut().drain(..) {
        let ty = fcx.normalize(span, ty);
-        fcx.require_type_is_sized(ty, span, code);
+        // ScalableSIMD: Justify this.


This check should be moved to the call sites of require_type_is_sized_deferred.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:15:58Z

compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/loongarch.rs

@@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ where
                }
            }
        },
-        Abi::Vector { .. } | Abi::Uninhabited => return Err(CannotUseFpConv),
+        Abi::Vector { .. } | Abi::ScalableVector { .. } | Abi::Uninhabited => {


Make this unreachable! or bug!.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:22:17Z

compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/powerpc64.rs

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ where
            RegKind::Integer => false,
            RegKind::Float => true,
            RegKind::Vector => arg.layout.size.bits() == 128,
+            RegKind::ScalableVector => true,


Unreachable.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:36:51Z

compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/call/x86_win64.rs

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ pub fn compute_abi_info<Ty>(fn_abi: &mut FnAbi<'_, Ty>) {
                // FIXME(eddyb) there should be a size cap here
                // (probably what clang calls "illegal vectors").
            }
+            Abi::ScalableVector { .. } => {}


Unreachable.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:38:07Z

compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs

+            } else if let ty::Slice(e_ty) = f0_ty.kind()
+                && def.repr().scalable()
+            {
+                (*e_ty, 1, false)


Make e_len an Option.

Amanieu · 2024-03-27T15:38:49Z

compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs

+                if def.repr().scalable()
+                    && variants[FIRST_VARIANT].iter().all(|field| !field.0.is_zst())
+                {
+                    bug!("Fields for a Scalable vector should be a ZST");


This check is incorrect.

Amanieu

Some of the earlier comments still haven't been addressed.

Also this could use a test for when a scalable vector is live across an await or generator yield.

Amanieu · 2024-05-09T21:35:50Z

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/type_check/mod.rs

-                // an NLL error, it's a required check to prevent creation
-                // of unsized rvalues in a call expression.
-                self.tcx().dcx().emit_err(MoveUnsized { ty, span });
+            if !ty.is_scalable_simd() {


This is not needed, it's already handled in the callers of ensure_place_sized.

Amanieu · 2024-05-13T18:47:19Z

library/core/src/intrinsics/simd.rs

+    #[cfg(not(bootstrap))]
+    #[rustc_nounwind]
+    pub fn simd_reinterpret<Src: ?Sized, Dst: ?Sized>(src: Src) -> Dst;


This needs a doc comment explaining what this intrinsic is for. In this case you can just say that it is a replacement for transmute that is specifically for use by scalable SIMD types which are !Sized.

Amanieu · 2024-05-13T18:49:36Z

library/core/src/intrinsics/simd.rs

@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
    /// * Not be infinite
    /// * Be representable in the return type, after truncating off its fractional part
    #[rustc_nounwind]
-    pub fn simd_cast<T, U>(x: T) -> U;
+    pub fn simd_cast<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(x: T) -> U;


Add a line in the docs about restrictions for scalable vector types (On the line that talks about T and U).

Amanieu · 2024-05-13T19:00:58Z

compiler/rustc_smir/src/rustc_smir/convert/abi.rs

@@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Stable<'tcx> for rustc_abi::Abi {
                ValueAbi::Vector { element: element.stable(tables), count }
            }
            rustc_abi::Abi::Aggregate { sized } => ValueAbi::Aggregate { sized },
+            rustc_abi::Abi::ScalableVector { element: _element, elt: _elt } => todo!(),


We need to figure out how this maps to stable MIR.

Amanieu · 2024-06-08T11:59:56Z

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/sty.rs

@@ -2874,6 +2888,10 @@ impl<'tcx> Ty<'tcx> {
    /// This is mostly useful for optimizations, as these are the types
    /// on which we can replace cloning with dereferencing.
    pub fn is_trivially_pure_clone_copy(self) -> bool {
+        if self.is_scalable_simd() {


This should be removed.

compiler-errors

The feature gating for relaxing Sized checks in gather_locals seems to have the side-effect of allowing non-repr(scalable) unsized types also be valid locals. That should probably be fixed before this lands.

We probably need to find a better way of enforcing that a local may be Sized or repr(scalable), rather than just not registering Sized bounds for certain locals, since we don't know whether a type is Sized or not before we've done type checking. Perhaps we can use a new built-in trait like Local that's impl'd for T: Sized or when the struct is repr(scalable) or something.

compiler-errors · 2024-06-27T14:21:51Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/gather_locals.rs

@@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for GatherLocalsVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
            let var_ty = self.assign(p.span, p.hir_id, None);

            if let Some((ty_span, hir_id)) = self.outermost_fn_param_pat {
-                if !self.fcx.tcx.features().unsized_fn_params {
+                if !(self.fcx.tcx.features().unsized_fn_params
+                    || self.fcx.tcx.features().repr_scalable)


Does this not cause us to accept regular unsized fn params as well once repr_scalable is enabled? That isn't correct.

compiler-errors · 2024-06-27T14:22:47Z

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/gather_locals.rs

@@ -162,7 +164,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for GatherLocalsVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
                    );
                }
            } else {
-                if !self.fcx.tcx.features().unsized_locals {
+                if !(self.fcx.tcx.features().unsized_locals


Similarly, this causes us to accept unsized locals if repr_scalable is enabled. This doesn't seem correct.

michaelmaitland

From the LLVM LangRef:

The number of elements is a constant integer value larger than 0; elementtype may be any integer, floating-point or pointer type. Vectors of size zero are not allowed

Should we test this behavior in this PR?

Additionally, I think we are missing tests for the case where you try and create a bad scalable type:

#[repr(simd, scalable(4))]
pub struct BadScalableType1 {
    _ty: [f32],
    _ty2: [f32]
}

I'd like to know more about what is allowed / not allowed here. Does the name inside the struct matter? What if it isn't an array?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:38:52Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/abi.rs

+            // vector. The use of 16 here is chosen as that will generate a valid type with both
+            // Arm SVE and RISC-V RVV. In the future with other architectures this might not be
+            // valid and might have to be configured by the target.
+            RegKind::ScalableVector => cx.type_scalable_vector(cx.type_i8(), 16),


Why do we use i8 and 16 instead of basing it off of the original type information?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:39:05Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/metadata.rs

@@ -1052,6 +1052,7 @@ fn build_struct_type_di_node<'ll, 'tcx>(
                        Cow::Borrowed(f.name.as_str())
                    };
                    let field_layout = struct_type_and_layout.field(cx, i);
+


nit: unrelated newline?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:40:52Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/intrinsic.rs

@@ -1176,12 +1197,16 @@ fn generic_simd_intrinsic<'ll, 'tcx>(
            InvalidMonomorphization::MismatchedLengths { span, name, m_len, v_len }
        );
        match m_elem_ty.kind() {
-            ty::Int(_) => {}
+            ty::Int(_) | ty::Bool => {}


Why is this change Arm SVE specific? RISC-V RVV also has scalable bool vector types. I don't think we need to make this comment target specific. We want to support scalable vectors of bool element type.

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:41:16Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/intrinsic.rs

@@ -2271,6 +2296,7 @@ fn generic_simd_intrinsic<'ll, 'tcx>(
            out_elem
        });
    }
+


nit: unrelated newline?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:41:57Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/type_.rs

@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ impl<'ll> CodegenCx<'ll, '_> {
        unsafe { llvm::LLVMVectorType(ty, len as c_uint) }
    }

+    pub(crate) fn type_scalable_vector(&self, ty: &'ll Type, len: u64) -> &'ll Type {


nit: len does not make sense here. maybe elt_cnt is better?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:43:12Z

compiler/rustc_abi/src/lib.rs

@@ -1266,6 +1274,10 @@ pub enum Abi {
    Uninhabited,
    Scalar(Scalar),
    ScalarPair(Scalar, Scalar),
+    ScalableVector {
+        element: Scalar,
+        elt: u64,


nit: elt -> elt_cnt?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:45:22Z

compiler/rustc_ast_passes/src/feature_gate.rs

+                                &self,
+                                repr_scalable,
+                                attr.span,
+                                "Scalable SIMD types are experimental and possibly buggy"


Why do we call these SIMD? Is it because they are part of the simd crate? If so, that's unfortunate since SVE and RVV is not SIMD. The these extensions allow the vector length to vary at runtime whereas with SIMD the vector length is fixed at compile time. The best term is scalable vector types.

I'm not suggesting or requesting a change here, just making an observation.

Using the term scalable vector types can also cause confusion. I have spoken with a few people that when you say scalable vectors, they think it's something to with vectors in the sense of a Vec not these types, although there would be context here.

Saying they allow the vector length to change at runtime is not correct here, that would be considered undefined behavior with SVE in LLVM and Rust. With SVE the vector length isn't changed, rather lanes are masked off. Changing vector length at runtime for SVE could lead to an incorrect stack if any SVE register was spilled to the stack. During execution SVE should be a fixed vector size with lanes ignored (for predicated instructions) based on the governing predicate.

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T14:57:06Z

compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0799.md

+A scalable SIMD type was used in a context where they cannot exist. Scalable
+SIMD types exist in a place that is somewhere between `Sized` and `Unsized`
+therefore have restrictions on the uses. A scalable SIMD type can't exist in any
+of the following:


Im not sure that telling a user they are somewhere between Sized and Unsized is helpful. Does that mean they are neither Sized or Unsized? Does that mean they are both Sized and Unsized? Is there really a third class of StaticUnknownConstantSized that we have yet to introduce? My opinion is that they should be neither Sized nor Unsized and we should not introduce a new trait, but should allow copying in certain circumstances without having Copy trait.

I suggest the following verbiage:

A scalable SIMD type was used in a context where they cannot exist. The size of a Scalable SIMD type is constant but unknown at compile time. Therefore restrictions are placed on their uses. A scalable SIMD type can't exist in any of the following:

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T15:07:50Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/ffi.rs

@@ -888,6 +888,7 @@ extern "C" {
    // Operations on array, pointer, and vector types (sequence types)
    pub fn LLVMPointerTypeInContext(C: &Context, AddressSpace: c_uint) -> &Type;
    pub fn LLVMVectorType(ElementType: &Type, ElementCount: c_uint) -> &Type;


Does LLVMVectorType need to be renamed to LLVMFixedVectorType?

michaelmaitland · 2024-06-27T15:16:03Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/debuginfo.rs

@@ -366,6 +366,24 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
                    return;
                }

+                // LLVM doesn't handle stores on some of the internal SVE types that we are required


It looks like this is target independent file but we are adding target specific code. I'm not sure this belongs here. I would prefer to generalize this as such:

if target.some_property(operand) return

I am also confused why we're only returning in the case that we have a <vscale x i1 x 16> type. Why that type specifically? What about a <vscale x i1 x 32> or a <vscale x i32 x 4>?

On RISC-V we can spill all vector types. It is done using a vector store instruction. I am pretty sure SVE can do this too.

Amanieu · 2024-07-02T08:07:18Z

@JamieCunliffe Do you have any updates on this? The last commit to this PR is over 2 months ago and the RFC text was last updated 9 months ago.

I've talked with several people in Google, Huawei and Microsoft, all of whom have expressed a rather urgent desire for the ability to use SVE intrinsics in Rust code, especially now that SVE hardware is generally available.

The representation of the element type has been changed to be a slice rather than a zero length array. Two feature gates are now required in core_arch unsized fn params and unsized locals. This still leaves unsized return types being an issue. For this we are currently bypassing some of the `Sized` trait checking to pass when the type is scalable simd. This still leaves the copy issue. For that we have marked scalable simd types as trivally pure clone copy. We have still had to remove some trait checks for the copy trait with this though as they are still performed in certain situations. The implementation of `transmute` is also an issue for us. For this a new SIMD intrinsic has been created simd_reinterpret which performs a transmute on SIMD vectors. A few intrinsics need to be able to produce an LLVM `undef` this intrinsic will also produce that when given a zero sized input.

Rather than not spilling any scalable SIMD types for debug info, we only avoid spilling the ones that are going to cause a problem. Currently the only ones known to cause a problem are the internal svbool types for AArch64.

Tests to ensure that scalable SIMD types can't exist in struct, union, enum variants and compound types. This also changes the well formed checking of types to improve the error message when scalable SIMD types are included. The previous implementation would also allow a scalable SIMD type as the last element within a struct in some cases which we currently don't want to allow.

Ensures that an SVE type can have a reference taken to it. This currently emits a `dereferenceable` attribute for the ptr using the element size as the number of bytes. While not perfect this is correct as a vector will always have a least one primitive.

Rather than forcing the user to enable the unsized_fn_params and unsized_locals features, we condition those features tests with if the type is a scalable simd type.

Add some comments explaining some not so obvious things. Mark code as unreachable on architectures that don't currently have scalable vectors. Remove some unused (and incorrect) checks that were being performed. Refactor some code to improve it's readability.

Scalable vectors are unsized types so we can't hold them across an await point. Also clean up the tests to remove unsized features from tests as a user shouldn't have to enable them when using scalable vectors.

rust-log-analyzer · 2024-07-26T16:10:32Z

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

#16 2.735 Building wheels for collected packages: reuse
#16 2.736   Building wheel for reuse (pyproject.toml): started
#16 2.977   Building wheel for reuse (pyproject.toml): finished with status 'done'
#16 2.978   Created wheel for reuse: filename=reuse-4.0.3-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_35_x86_64.whl size=132715 sha256=dfa09868353292d98f811d3efdb0d54d07389e808efc71d68e3b93c514bf8bec
#16 2.979   Stored in directory: /tmp/pip-ephem-wheel-cache-2gsb69cr/wheels/3d/8d/0a/e0fc6aba4494b28a967ab5eaf951c121d9c677958714e34532
#16 2.981 Installing collected packages: boolean-py, binaryornot, tomlkit, reuse, python-debian, markupsafe, license-expression, jinja2, chardet, attrs
#16 3.373 Successfully installed attrs-23.2.0 binaryornot-0.4.4 boolean-py-4.0 chardet-5.2.0 jinja2-3.1.4 license-expression-30.3.0 markupsafe-2.1.5 python-debian-0.1.49 reuse-4.0.3 tomlkit-0.13.0
#16 3.373 WARNING: Running pip as the 'root' user can result in broken permissions and conflicting behaviour with the system package manager. It is recommended to use a virtual environment instead: https://pip.pypa.io/warnings/venv
#16 DONE 3.5s
---
    Checking toml_edit v0.22.12
error[E0063]: missing field `scalable` in initializer of `ReprOptions`
   --> crates/hir-def/src/data/adt.rs:177:10
    |
177 |     Some(ReprOptions { int, align: max_align, pack: min_pack, flags, field_shuffle_seed: 0 })

   Compiling itoa v1.0.11
   Compiling ryu v1.0.18
   Compiling rust-analyzer v0.0.0 (/checkout/src/tools/rust-analyzer/crates/rust-analyzer)

bors · 2024-07-28T21:46:55Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #128313) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Amanieu · 2024-09-13T18:11:18Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/intrinsic.rs

+                bx.bitcast(val, llret_ty)
+            }
+            OperandValue::ZeroSized => bx.const_undef(llret_ty),
+            OperandValue::Pair(_, _) => todo!(),


Use InvalidMonomorphization instead of todo!

Amanieu · 2024-09-13T18:16:04Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs

@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ pub fn codegen_mir<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>(

            if memory_locals.contains(local) {
                debug!("alloc: {:?} -> place", local);
-                if layout.is_unsized() {
+                if layout.is_unsized() && !layout.is_runtime_sized() {


This cannot possibly work, alloca doesn't have a valid size to allocate.

Amanieu · 2024-09-13T18:19:56Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/builder.rs

+        if !place.layout.is_runtime_sized() {
+            assert_eq!(place.val.llextra.is_some(), place.layout.is_unsized());
+        }


Suggested change

if !place.layout.is_runtime_sized() {

assert_eq!(place.val.llextra.is_some(), place.layout.is_unsized());

}

assert_eq!(place.val.llextra.is_some(), place.layout.is_unsized() && !place.layout.is_runtime_sized());

rustbot assigned Amanieu Dec 13, 2023

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 13, 2023

compiler-errors reviewed Dec 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

bjorn3 mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2023

SVE types and intrinsics rust-lang/stdarch#1509

Draft

bjorn3 reviewed Dec 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

This was referenced Jan 23, 2024

Implement AES backend for riscv using crypto extensions RustCrypto/block-ciphers#399

Closed

Implement AES backend for ARMv9 using SVE2-AES RustCrypto/block-ciphers#403

Closed

Amanieu reviewed Mar 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

JamieCunliffe force-pushed the sve branch from 28b752a to a371ac9 Compare May 3, 2024 14:18

Amanieu reviewed Jun 8, 2024

View reviewed changes

Amanieu mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2024

Add f16 inline ASM support for RISC-V #126530

Merged

Amanieu mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2024

RFC: Add a scalable representation to allow support for scalable vectors rust-lang/rfcs#3268

Open

compiler-errors requested changes Jun 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

michaelmaitland reviewed Jun 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

JamieCunliffe added 9 commits July 24, 2024 14:39

Add feature gate for Scalable SIMD types

6624e8a

Fix incorrect type representation in test.

5869f9d

Return Err in homogeneous_aggregate rather than lie about the Size.

0324ff4

Add ?Sized bound to some SIMD intrinsics.

d5834cc

Don't require the user to enable the unsized features.

e237c35

Rather than forcing the user to enable the unsized_fn_params and unsized_locals features, we condition those features tests with if the type is a scalable simd type.

JamieCunliffe added 4 commits July 24, 2024 14:39

Test case to ensure functions that take scalable vectors don't impl Fn.

1adf6ca

Disallow scalable vectors in async fn.

f18804e

Scalable vectors are unsized types so we can't hold them across an await point. Also clean up the tests to remove unsized features from tests as a user shouldn't have to enable them when using scalable vectors.

Remove scalable simd check from is_trivially_pure_clone_copy

63f9d37

JamieCunliffe force-pushed the sve branch from a371ac9 to 63f9d37 Compare July 26, 2024 15:59

Amanieu reviewed Sep 13, 2024

View reviewed changes

Support for a scalable simd representation #118917

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Support for a scalable simd representation #118917

Conversation

JamieCunliffe commented Dec 13, 2023

Noratrieb commented Dec 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

compiler-errors Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lcnr Apr 6, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lcnr Apr 6, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amanieu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

michaelmaitland left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Amanieu commented Jul 2, 2024

rust-log-analyzer commented Jul 26, 2024

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

compiler-errors Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

lcnr Apr 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

lcnr Apr 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

michaelmaitland left a comment •

edited

Loading

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

michaelmaitland Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading