Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate i18n namespaces feature-wise: secrets #5809

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

jathushan-r
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Describe the problem, feature, improvement or the change introduces by the PR briefly. Add screenshots/GIFs if UI/UX changes are introduced. Remove this placeholder when you're editing.

Related Issues

Related PRs

  • Related PR #1 or (None)

Checklist

  • e2e cypress tests locally verified.
  • Manual test round performed and verified.
  • UX/UI review done on the final implementation.
  • Documentation provided. (Add links if there are any)
  • Unit tests provided. (Add links if there are any)
  • Integration tests provided. (Add links if there are any)

Security checks

@jathushan-r jathushan-r marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2024 08:35
@jathushan-r jathushan-r marked this pull request as draft March 21, 2024 15:57
@jathushan-r jathushan-r marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2024 04:19
@jathushan-r jathushan-r changed the title Separate i18n namespaces feature-wise: secrets, templates Separate i18n namespaces feature-wise: secrets Mar 25, 2024
@wso2-jenkins-bot
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ No Changeset found

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go.

If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Refer Release Documentation to learn how to add a changeset.

@JayaShakthi97 JayaShakthi97 merged commit d0a3de4 into wso2:master Mar 26, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants