Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LSPS2: ability to signal channel open failure #137

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 10 additions & 7 deletions src/lsps2/payment_queue.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ impl PaymentQueue {
position.map(|position| self.payments.remove(position))
}

pub(crate) fn clear(&mut self) -> Vec<InterceptedHTLC> {
self.payments.drain(..).map(|(_k, v)| v).flatten().collect()
pub(crate) fn clear(&mut self) -> Vec<(PaymentHash, Vec<InterceptedHTLC>)> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Not sure this change is worth as it makes things more complex and you only make use of it in one place where you then have to map to get rid of the InterceptedHTLCs. Why not just use InterceptedHTLC::payment_hash instead? If you're worried about duplicates, could just use dedup or collect a HashSet?

self.payments.drain(..).collect()
}
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,11 +109,14 @@ mod tests {
);
assert_eq!(
payment_queue.clear(),
vec![InterceptedHTLC {
intercept_id: InterceptId([1; 32]),
expected_outbound_amount_msat: 300_000_000,
payment_hash: PaymentHash([101; 32]),
}]
vec![(
PaymentHash([101; 32]),
vec![InterceptedHTLC {
intercept_id: InterceptId([1; 32]),
expected_outbound_amount_msat: 300_000_000,
payment_hash: PaymentHash([101; 32]),
}]
)]
);
}
}
83 changes: 81 additions & 2 deletions src/lsps2/service.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ use crate::prelude::{HashMap, String, ToString, Vec};
use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex, RwLock};

use lightning::events::HTLCDestination;
use lightning::ln::channelmanager::{AChannelManager, InterceptId};
use lightning::ln::channelmanager::{AChannelManager, FailureCode, InterceptId};
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentHash};
use lightning::util::errors::APIError;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -362,7 +362,13 @@ impl OutboundJITChannelState {
let mut payment_queue_lock = payment_queue.lock().unwrap();
let payment_forwarded =
OutboundJITChannelState::PaymentForwarded { channel_id: *channel_id };
let forward_htlcs = ForwardHTLCsAction(*channel_id, payment_queue_lock.clear());
let htlcs = payment_queue_lock
.clear()
.into_iter()
.map(|(_, htlcs)| htlcs)
.flatten()
.collect();
let forward_htlcs = ForwardHTLCsAction(*channel_id, htlcs);
Ok((payment_forwarded, Some(forward_htlcs)))
},
OutboundJITChannelState::PaymentForwarded { channel_id } => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -898,6 +904,79 @@ where
Ok(())
}

/// Used by LSP to fail intercepted htlcs backwards when the channel open fails for any reason.
///
/// Should be called in response to receiving a [`LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel`] event.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment is a bit misleading. It should be called after we get the event, but of course only if the channel open failed?

///
/// The JIT channel state is reset such that the payer can attempt payment again.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we also expose a "abandon" variant that doesn't reset, but just prunes all state related to the channel open?

/// [`LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel`]: crate::lsps2::event::LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel
pub fn channel_open_failed(
&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, user_channel_id: u128,
) -> Result<(), APIError> {
let outer_state_lock = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
match outer_state_lock.get(counterparty_node_id) {
Some(inner_state_lock) => {
let mut peer_state = inner_state_lock.lock().unwrap();

if let Some(intercept_scid) =
peer_state.intercept_scid_by_user_channel_id.get(&user_channel_id).copied()
{
if let Some(jit_channel) =
peer_state.outbound_channels_by_intercept_scid.get_mut(&intercept_scid)
{
let new_state = if let OutboundJITChannelState::PendingChannelOpen {
payment_queue,
..
} = &jit_channel.state
{
let mut queue = payment_queue.lock().unwrap();
let payment_hashes = queue
.clear()
.into_iter()
.map(|(payment_hash, _)| payment_hash)
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
for payment_hash in payment_hashes {
self.channel_manager.get_cm().fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason(
&payment_hash,
FailureCode::TemporaryNodeFailure,
);
}
OutboundJITChannelState::PendingInitialPayment {
payment_queue: payment_queue.clone(),
}
} else {
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
err: format!("Channel is not in the PendingChannelOpen state.",),
});
};
jit_channel.state = new_state;
} else {
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
err: format!(
"Failed to map the stored intercept_scid {} for the provided user_channel_id {} to a channel.",
intercept_scid,
user_channel_id,
),
});
}
} else {
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
err: format!(
"Could not find a channel with user_channel_id {}",
user_channel_id
),
});
}
},
None => {
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError {
err: format!("No counterparty state for: {}", counterparty_node_id),
});
},
}
Ok(())
}

/// Forward [`Event::ChannelReady`] event parameters into this function.
///
/// Will forward the intercepted HTLC if it matches a channel
Expand Down
Loading